Hours after publishing the secret of the vax, the doctor is dead!
Was it murder?
In yesterday’s blog, I was preparing readers for this video. I wish it were not true, but it seems to be, and we must face reality. I will continue to provide any information that I find which offers means and/or remedies to thwart these “fiery darts” of the wicked ones.
As I stated yesterday, I was holding back on publishing the video until I had sent it to two highly-credentialed scientist friends of mine for review and vetting the science in the video.
Both are very busy individuals and having a report back from one already, I am going forward with helping this video get widespread exposure.
The video was made by a German PhD chemist within the past few weeks and within hours of its release on the internet, the scientist-businessman is dead!
One must wonder if what he reveals in the video was so threatening to the globalists’ agenda—detailed in yesterday’s blog—that they ordered a “hit.” Here is a link to the video which runs about 18 minutes.
My scientist friend responded to the video with these comments. To protect his/her identity, I will call him/her “Dr. Vetter.” All emphasis is mine.
I found the video on graphene and oxidized graphene to be basically consistent with what I have learned over the past few years working with graphene in collaboration with bioengineers at [prestigious university’s name withheld by JWB].
Science journals and researchers are exhausted from trying to find new superlatives for this wondrous nanomaterial composed purely of carbon: it’s the lightest, strongest (200 hundred times stronger than steel), thinnest, best heat- and electricity-conducting material ever discovered.
Its discoverers received the Nobel prize in 2010. It holds promise to revolutionize everything from airplane construction to how we repair potholes in the road. We use it every week in the lab as a substrate upon which to sequence small amounts of DNA.
However, despite all the superlatives about graphene, there have been those who have tried to warn the science community, months before Dr. Andreas Noack’s video, that graphene and graphene oxides pose a potential health risk to individuals exposed to this type of nanoparticle and have urged studies on human toxicity be undertaken.
For example, one paper listed by NIH Pub Med showed that in cultures of white blood cells that graphene oxide induced cell death, while specifically in mouse macrophages they elicited harmful inflammatory responses that would pose a health risk to humans exposed to this type of carbon-based nanoparticle.
Another recent study that suggested a less than rosy angle for graphene was reported by a team of biologists, engineers and material scientists at Brown University.
They examined graphene’s potential toxicity in human cells and found, as Dr. Noack indicated in his video, that the jagged edges of graphene nanoparticles are super-sharp and super-strong, easily piercing through cell membranes in human lung, skin and immune cells, suggesting the potential to do serious damage in humans and other animals.
So why would vaccine makers want to use it? I believe it is because it acts as an adjuvant to boost the production of antibodies by host cells after infection with virus. It also has been shown to improve permeability of the cell membrane to the viral liposomes (mRNA nanoparticles).
Pfizer claims they do NOT use graphene to coat the mRNA lipid nanoparticles. Their list of chemicals used in making the vaccine does not include graphene as being present.
But then they also do not list latex, a highly-allergenic substance, which we at [university’s name withheld—JWB] found in the vaccine and reported to Pfizer (a problem which they now claim to have corrected). [I believe we have also posted a video by Karen Kingston, formerly a high-level employee of Pfizer, who also refutes Pfizer's denial. --JWB]
To use such a high risk, untested chemical substance in any biomedical application that involved humans could only be for greedy or nefarious purposes.
Bottom line is that there is no question that graphene and graphene oxides hold great potential as a material for commercial, non-biological uses but that its use in biomedicine and drug manufacturing should be prohibited unless it can be proven it is safe (which I doubt it ever will be, given its chemical-physical characteristics).
Given that Dr. Noack died shortly after reporting his findings further indicates how important it is for you to publish your blog. I believe we will hear much more about graphene in the coming days despite what I expect will be vigorous efforts by the elites of Mystery Babylon to suppress it. Thank you for sharing it with me.
Blessings, Dr. Vetter
In a related story, this also just came to my attention. I cannot vouch for the authenticity of this report, but it would certainly explain a lot—and would confirm what many of us have suspected from the beginning of the jabs.
There are numerous videos on the web (I’ve seen some) which clearly show the jabs being fake-injected into the arms of famous and/or important people.
Whistleblower nurse says politicians receive saline instead of mRNA jab
QUOTE: [In] The eastern European country of Slovenia a person purporting to be a whistleblower nurse claims that politicians and other high-ranking citizens receive saline instead of the mRNA experimental medication.
In a video on Facebook, which has been deleted by YouTube, the woman claiming to be the head nurse of the University Medical Center in Ljubljana, which takes care of receiving and managing the jab bottles for politicians, resigned and gave a press conference on the scandal.
During the conference she showed codes on the bottles where each contains 1, 2 or 3 digits, and then explained the meaning of those numbers. Number 1 is the placebo: saline. END QUOTE